Contemporary+Aboriginal+Spiritualities+-+Links

= **Relevant Links: Are they relevant, useful, reliable and valid?** =

This link is extremely relevant because it provides information on Aboriginal Art, History and Culture. This includes kinship, ceremonial life and obligations/ connections to land, which is what this task required information on. This made the site very useful. This website particularly helped with the FAQ about Aboriginal spirituality. It gave me great, small points/ideas about what to include in the answer, especially for obligations/connections to land, which is slightly more challenging to explain the question. Of course, the language tab wasn't useful to me, but I found nothing useless about the information that was relevant this task. It is all useful and very informative, despite the information being quite minimal. The information that this website contained was definitely all reliable. The information can be corroborated with a number of additional sources such as the Living Religion - Third Edition textbook, especially the matter of kinship, ceremonial life and obligations to the land and people. This website would also be considered reliable because the address ends with 'info'. It is a known fact that any website ending with 'info', 'edu', org, 'gov' is always reliable. There may be some bias, therefore exaggerated/untrue information included on the website in rare cases, but they're usually 100% reliable. On the other hand, websites that end with, 'com.au', 'com', etc, are not so reliable because anybody can edit them, for example; Wikipedia. Because the information provided on this website is reliable, that would also make it extremely valid.
 * Link No. 1:** 
 * Is it relevant, useful, reliable and valid?**

This link is extremely relevant to this task because it dedicated to Mabo, who is very important to Contemporary Aboriginal Spiritualities and the Land Rights Movement. It is very usefu l because it provides the audience with a profuse amount of information about Mabo and his epic struggle to gain Land Rights/Native Title. It also helps anybody understand the Mabo Case a little better since it is full of detailed information and includes great videos. There are many links to click on as well which proves it includes everything you need to know. Now, it //does// end with '.com', but it is reliable. It is a government site nonetheless, and it has information that can be corroborated by a number of additional sources, especially the dates, Eddie Mabo's profile and interesting facts. Also, the videos are 100% authentic, therefore, they are reliable and incredibly useful. Since this website and the information on it is reliable, that means it is also valid.
 * Link No. 2:** 
 * Is it relevant, useful, reliable and valid?**

This link is relevant because it provides information directly about dispossession that Aborigines experienced. This relates directly to the second FAQ that had to be answered. It was useful because it helps answer that particular. The information was detailed and it would help anybody understand the issue of dispossession more than they did before. It gives the audience the entire history of Indigenous dispossession suffering since the Europeans arrived in Australia in 1788. It also includes very good primary source visual aids that are obviously also 100% authentic. This website is reliable because it is a government site, so there would be no false information whatsoever and it would be all authentic. The information on the website could also be corroborated by a plethora of additional sources, such as books, other websites, etc. Therefore, seeing that this source is quite reliable, it would also be considered valid.
 * Link No. 3:** 
 * Is it relevant, useful, reliable and valid?**